.png)
Pricing can either boost SaaS growth or quietly eat away at revenue. Yet many product teams still rely on guesswork and quick fixes to set their prices. In this guide, we’ll explore why so many companies fall into reactive pricing habits and how a 5-step framework can help you create a more strategic, long-term plan for monetization.
The Status Quo: Ad Hoc and Reactive Pricing Decisions
Today, plenty of SaaS businesses pick their pricing on the fly—without a proper plan or research. Some founders copy a competitor’s pricing page the night before launch. Others panic and cut prices when a big customer threatens to leave. In fact, research by OpenView Partners shows that fewer than 40% of SaaS companies truly use value-based pricing – the rest wing it with judgment calls, mimicking competitors, or simplistic cost-plus math.
When very little data goes into pricing decisions, the result is often a series of one-off responses, like slashing prices to address churn or offering random discounts because a competitor just launched a cheaper plan. Over time, you end up with a pricing structure that doesn’t match your product’s real value or your company’s goals. The prevalence of ad hoc pricing isn’t just anecdotal; it shows up in data. Only 6% had ever done in-depth pricing research on customer needs and willingness to pay – and nearly half admitted they haven’t done any pricing research.
With so little rigor, it’s no wonder many companies struggle to monetize effectively. Lacking a strategy also creates internal confusion: sales teams get mixed signals on discounting and packaging, leading to inconsistent deals and eroded margins. As the SaaS market matures and customers become more value-conscious, the “best guess” approach to pricing no longer cuts it.
Whether you’re just figuring out a pricing strategy for a SaaS startup or revisiting pricing at a scale-up, adopting a structured framework will save you from costly mistakes.
The good news is, you don’t need to reinvent the wheel to fix it – there are proven frameworks to guide you. But why do you even need a SaaS pricing framework is the question you need to have an answer first.
Why You Need a Structured Pricing System (Not More Band-Aids)
To stop reacting to every pricing fire drill, you need a repeatable system. One that outlines how you set prices, who makes pricing decisions, and when you review or adjust them. Instead of patching each problem separately, a structured framework helps you tackle root causes in a logical order. Picture it as moving from “whack-a-mole” to a planned roadmap: everyone from the executive team to product and sales knows how your pricing is defined, updated, and communicated.
A structured approach also forces you to define the why behind each pricing change. Instead of reacting to “Competitor X just lowered their price, let’s do the same!”, you compare any potential change to your overall strategy. Are you aiming to move upmarket, expand existing accounts, or land more early-stage startups?
Different goals demand different pricing tactics, and a good framework makes those trade-offs explicit.
So what does a structured pricing framework look like? In the next section, we’ll walk through a 5-step pricing framework drawn from modern, field-tested practices in the SaaS industry.
The 5-Step Pricing Framework for Sustainable SaaS Growth
At a high level, the framework covers five essential stages:
- Goals & Segments: Define what you’re trying to achieve and who your customers are.
- Positioning & Packaging: Design pricing tiers or bundles that resonate with each target segment.
- Price Metric: Determine the value metric that best aligns price with usage and customer value (e.g. per user, per API call, per GB).
- Rate-Setting (Price Points): Set the right price levels for each package, based on data and perceived value – not guesswork.
- Operationalization: Implement the pricing effectively in your sales process and systems, and keep iterating as you learn.
This structured approach brings discipline to what is often a chaotic process. It ensures you ask the right questions in the right order. Too many companies jump straight to “What should our price be?” (Step 4) or “Should we use usage-based or per-seat pricing?” (Step 3) without ever aligning on the fundamentals of who they’re serving and what they’re trying to achieve. The 5-step framework forces you to lay the groundwork first. By the time you choose a pricing model and specific price points, those decisions are supported by strategy and data.
Step 1: Goals & Segments - Setting the Foundation
The first step is laying a solid foundation: align on your business goals and clearly define your customer segments. You need to know what you’re trying to achieve with pricing (e.g. maximize revenue, drive adoption, increase margins) and who your target customers are (e.g. SMB, mid-market, enterprise). Without consensus here, everything else can crumble.
In fact, many pricing problems aren’t really pricing issues at all – they’re symptoms of internal misalignment on strategy and target customer. If Product, Sales, and Leadership each have different assumptions about the ideal customer or the pricing objective, you’ll end up with conflicting strategies and chaotic execution.
Purpose & Logic: Clarifying goals ensures your pricing strategy serves your company’s priorities. For example, a young startup might prioritize user growth over profit per customer – leading to a low-cost or freemium model – whereas a mature company focused on profitability will aim for higher ARPU (Average Revenue per User) and strong margins.
At the same time, defining customer segments (and their Ideal Customer Profiles) makes sure you tailor your pricing to the right audience. SaaS customers can range from bootstrapped startups to Fortune 500 enterprises, and their needs and willingness-to-pay vary widely. A one-size-fits-all pricing approach often ends up fitting nobody well. By explicitly segmenting, you can design offerings that resonate with each group’s value perception. Common segmentation criteria in B2B SaaS include:
- Company size or revenue: e.g. Small business vs. Mid-market vs. Enterprise (often by employee count or ARR). A 50-person company and a 5,000-person company have different budget levels and requirements.
- Industry or use case: e.g. Segments by vertical (finance, healthcare, etc.) or by primary use of your product. Different industries may value different features or have distinct compliance needs affecting pricing.
- User tier or role: e.g. Individual vs. Team vs. Department. For some products, you might segment freelancers, small teams, and large departments and offer packages aligned to their scale.
The goal is to ensure everyone internally agrees “these are our target segments, and this is what we want to achieve for each.” That alignment then guides all downstream pricing decisions. Misalignment at this stage can cause significant downstream issues – confusion, internal friction, and pricing that doesn’t fit the market. On the flip side, when you get this right, everything else flows more smoothly. Every team will be on the same page about who you’re selling to, which makes designing the pricing model far more straightforward.
Implementation Guidance: Then, have an honest conversation among your leadership and product team about your business goals. Are you trying to rapidly acquire users? Move upmarket to enterprise deals? Increase profitability? Rank these objectives, because they will influence trade-offs in pricing (e.g. a low-price strategy for adoption vs. a high-price for margin). Next, revisit your Ideal Customer Profiles.
Use data if available – analyze your customer base for natural groupings by size, usage, or value. If you’re pre-launch, define hypotheses for target segments based on market research. Document the key segments and get cross-functional buy-in.
A practical tip is to create simple profiles for each segment (e.g. “Startup SMB: 1-50 employees, < $10M revenue, needs quick setup and low cost” vs. “Enterprise: 1000+ employees, $1B revenue, requires advanced security and willing to pay for premium support”).
These profiles set the stage for packaging and pricing in the next steps. And if you find widely different personas or use cases, you may even decide to create separate offerings or product editions for each segment – which is exactly what this framework will help you do intentionally.
Real-World Example: Think of Zoom in its early days versus today. Early on, Zoom’s goal was viral user adoption, so they offered a generous free tier (40-minute meetings for up to 100 participants) to target the mass market of individuals and small businesses. Their pricing was geared towards user growth. As Zoom scaled and started courting enterprises, their objectives shifted to higher revenue per account and supporting complex corporate needs. They introduced enterprise plans with advanced admin features, longer durations, and premium support. If Zoom’s team hadn’t been clear on these different segments (individuals/freemium, SMB, enterprise) and the goal for each, they might have priced the product too high for the SMB users or too low for enterprises. By clarifying “who and why” up front, Zoom was able to create a tiered model that draws in millions of free users while upselling larger organizations on paid plans – aligning with their growth-first then revenue-focused goals.
The key takeaway: nail down your strategy and audience before you touch the price tag.
Step 2: Positioning & Packaging – Design Offers That Resonate
With your goals and segments defined, the next step is crafting the right packaging and positioning for your product. This is about how you bundle your features and present your offerings to each customer segment. Packaging isn’t just a matter of slapping three plans on a pricing page arbitrarily; it’s about creating options that make sense for your distinct customer profiles and guiding them to the right choice. Positioning goes hand-in-hand – it’s how you communicate the value of each package in a way that resonates with the target segment’s needs and mindset.
Purpose & Logic: Effective packaging ensures each customer segment sees an option that feels “just right” for them. A common approach is the classic Good-Better-Best tiered pricing. For example, a SaaS might offer a basic plan, a mid-tier with extra features, and a premium plan with the full suite. The logic is to capture different willingness-to-pay: budget-conscious users can start with the “Good” basic option, while power users with deeper needs pay for “Best”. Many top SaaS companies use this tiered model because it simplifies choice while covering a broad market.
Freshdesk, for instance, has multiple plans.
From a 14-day free trial after a signup, to a feature-rich tier aimed at enterprises at €79//agent/month, billed annually – each tier aligned with the scale and requirements of different customer sizes.
However, tiered packaging must be done thoughtfully. Simply creating three plans without understanding what each segment truly values can backfire.
One big mistake is “packing the top tier” with every feature and assuming enterprise customers will automatically buy it.
If your highest plan bundles tons of advanced features that a given customer doesn’t need, you risk that customer feeling oversold and seeking discounts or downgrades. They might end up paying for “shelfware” – features they don’t use – which breeds frustration and harms trust. Conversely, if your lower-tier plans are too bare-bones, smaller customers might churn or never convert, while mid-market customers could feel forced to jump to an expensive plan prematurely. The packaging sweet spot gives each segment meaningful value without excess bloat.
Implementation Guidance: Start by listing out your product’s features and identifying which segment cares most about each. Map features to segments: e.g. basic functionality that every user needs (good for all plans), advanced capabilities that only power-users or enterprises will value (put into higher tiers or as add-ons).
Decide on the number of packages you actually need – it might be three (a common default), but some models call for two or even five tiers. The key is coverage and clarity: enough choices to fit distinct needs, but not so many that customers get overwhelmed. It’s worth noting that around 3 packages is standard because of cognitive ease, but companies like Freshdesk have found success with 4-5 tiers by clearly delineating SMB vs. mid-market vs. enterprise offerings. Whatever you choose, avoid internal overlaps or meaningless distinctions. Each tier should have a clear rationale (e.g. “this plan is for small teams who need core features, this next plan adds advanced reporting for growing businesses, and the top plan includes enterprise security and support for large organizations”).
When positioning these packages, tailor the messaging to the segment. For an SMB-focused package, highlight affordability and simplicity (“Everything you need to get started, at a startup-friendly price”). For a high-end package, emphasize ROI, scalability, and support (“Complete solution for the enterprise, with advanced controls and dedicated support”). It can even help to create separate marketing pages or sections addressing each audience, so they immediately see a solution “built for” them. This way, an SMB user isn’t scared off by enterprise jargon, and an enterprise buyer recognizes you have an offering up to their standards.
Real-World Examples: A famous example (illustrated by Ajit Ghuman, CEO, Co-Founder, Monetizely) of packaging gone wrong is Zoom. At one point, Zoom’s pricing structure became overly complex – they had too many tiers, overlapping features across plans, and a maze of add-ons. Customers got confused by the choices; sales cycles dragged on as buyers tried to make sense of options, and conversion rates dropped. In fact, during the 2020 pandemic surge, Zoom found its growth stalling in part due to this packaging bloat. The company made a bold move to simplify its packages and eliminate unnecessary options. The result was higher conversions, faster deal velocity, and more predictable revenue. By streamlining to a cleaner “Basic/Pro/Business/Enterprise” set of plans and clarifying what each included, Zoom removed friction and guided customers more easily to the right plan. This underscores how critical it is to get packaging right – it can directly impact your sales momentum and revenue.
On the other hand, Gainsight, a Customer Success platform, initially used a rigid Good-Better-Best packaging. This sounds fine, but mid-market customers found the middle tier didn’t fit – it was either too limited or too expensive – pushing them to either choose the lowest tier or demand discounts on the highest. The top “Best” tier often included many features that went unused (classic shelfware), yet smaller customers who just needed one or two of those features were forced to upgrade and overpay. Gainsight recognized this misalignment and eventually shifted to a more flexible, modular packaging approach. Instead of strictly three bundles, they let customers add on the specific advanced features they needed without jumping straight to an all-inclusive enterprise plan. This change helped align what customers paid for with what they actually valued, improving customer satisfaction and reducing the need for steep discounts.
The lesson: Design your packaging so that each segment gets maximum value for them at the price point, with minimal waste. If you find one size doesn’t fit a certain segment, adjust your tiering or offer add-ons until it does.
Step 3: Pricing Metric – Align Price with Value
With packaging in place, the next consideration is how you will charge – your pricing metric. The pricing metric is the unit by which your customer pays for the product. In other words, what are you measuring or counting to determine the customer’s bill? Common SaaS pricing metrics include per user (seat-based pricing), usage-based (e.g. per 1,000 API calls, per GB of data, per active customer account), or a flat subscription for a certain feature bundle. Choosing the right metric is crucial because it needs to align with how customers derive value from your service and how your costs scale.
Purpose & Logic: The ideal pricing metric makes the customer feel that your price increases only as their value increases. It creates a win-win alignment. If the metric is misaligned, customers might feel gouged or discouraged from using your product.
For example, if you are charged by the number of support tickets filed in a helpdesk software, customers might actually avoid using the support tool to save money – a perverse incentive! Or if your metric is something unrelated to perceived value (like charging by data storage volume for a tool where the customer cares about number of user seats), it will cause confusion and pushback. Good metrics are usually tied to the key outcome or usage of the product: for instance, Twilio charges per API call (per text, per minute of call) – customers pay more only as they send more messages or make more calls, which directly correlates with the value they get from Twilio’s communications platform. This granular usage-based metric also lowered the barrier to entry (you can spend just a few cents to test Twilio), fueling widespread adoption among developers.
Importantly, the right metric also considers your cost structure and growth. If your service has variable costs (e.g. server load, third-party fees) proportional to usage, a usage-based metric ensures you cover costs at scale. On the other hand, if costs are more fixed and value is tied to user count (common in B2B SaaS), per-seat pricing might make sense for its predictability. Early-stage companies often favor simple usage-based models to encourage try-and-buy – customers can start small and expand naturally. Later, as revenue becomes predictable and customers are hooked, a company might introduce more predictable metrics. For instance, a startup might begin by charging per API call (so developers only pay for what they use), but as it lands bigger enterprise deals that demand budgeting consistency, it could move to user or license-based pricing with committed contracts.
Implementation Guidance: To choose your metric, look at how customers use your product and what they value most. Ask: what usage factor tends to increase when customers get more benefit? What metric scales roughly in line with customer success? Also consider simplicity – customers should find the metric logical and easy to track. If it’s too abstract or if they can’t predict their bill, it can create friction.
A good exercise is to simulate a small customer vs. a large customer: under candidate Metric A, does the large customer pay, say, 10x more than the small one and does that roughly match the value difference? If yes, that could be fair. If the large usage customer would end up paying 100x more for only 2x value, that metric may overcharge heavy users (or conversely, undercharge light users). Benchmark against your industry too: if all competitors charge per user, there may be customer expectations around that. You can still differentiate with a novel metric, but you’ll need to educate the market on why (e.g. “we charge per consumption so you only pay for what you use”). Ensure your product and systems can technically support measuring the metric accurately – e.g. tracking events, counting MAUs, etc. (This links to Step 5, as you’ll need to instrument it). Importantly, be willing to adjust if you sense a misalignment.
A well-known case is Mixpanel’s pricing metric pivot. Mixpanel, a SaaS analytics company, initially charged based on the number of data points (events) tracked. This was fine when their customers were smaller websites with modest event volumes. But as Mixpanel started selling to enterprises, issues arose. Big clients generating millions of events got hit with unpredictably high bills and didn’t necessarily feel those extra events delivered proportional value. An enterprise might ask, “Why am I paying so much more this month just because usage spiked, if those additional events didn’t yield new insights?” The event-based metric was causing sticker shock and forcing constant plan upgrades, leading to customer dissatisfaction and even churn. Mixpanel recognized that the value their clients got was more tied to the number of unique users they were analyzing (their audience size), rather than raw event counts. In 2019, they boldly switched to an MTU (Monthly Tracked Users) metric – charging by the number of unique users tracked per month. This change meant a customer’s bill scaled with the size of their user base (which correlated better with value derived from analytics), and not every click or pageview. It was a huge improvement. Mixpanel’s customers found this model more predictable and fair – their costs grew in line with their user growth, not random event surges. Additionally, Mixpanel revamped packaging alongside this (introducing packages tailored to use-cases like data pipelines, engagement messaging, etc., rather than one-size-fits-all). The outcome was a win: the new metric and packages reduced friction at renewals, cut down churn, and aligned revenue more closely with customer success. This illustrates how powerful the right pricing metric can be.
The lesson: Choose a metric that aligns with both how customers perceive value and how your costs accumulate. Sometimes this means educating customers on a new metric (as in AI services or cloud infrastructure pricing), but if it genuinely aligns with value, customers will appreciate the fairness over time.
Practical Tips: When implementing a new pricing metric, test it with a few customers or offer it as a parallel option before fully switching. Gather feedback on whether they find it fair and easy to understand. Ensure your sales team can clearly explain it (“You’ll be charged based on X because that correlates with the value you get; for example, if your usage is low one month, your bill is lower.”). Also, avoid mixing too many metrics in one model; simplicity is key. Some companies do blend metrics (e.g. a base subscription + overage fees for extra usage), but be cautious that this doesn’t become overly complex. The metric decision often has a big impact on product behavior as well – a poor choice can discourage usage (the last thing you want is customers using your product less to save money!). A good choice will encourage adoption (like a free tier up to a certain usage, or pricing that scales gently so customers aren’t afraid to use the product more).
Step 4: Rate-Setting – Find the Right Price Points
Now we arrive at what many think of as “pricing” proper: deciding the actual price points (the dollar amounts) for your packages and metrics. Only after you’ve done the groundwork on segmentation, packaging, and metrics are you ready to set prices that stick. Rate-setting is where strategy meets marketplace reality – it’s part science (data, math) and part art (psychology, positioning).
Purpose & Logic: The goal is to set prices that reflect your value while remaining competitive and enticing to customers. If you’ve nailed steps 1-3, rate-setting becomes easier because your packages and metrics are aligned with value. Now you ask: How much is that value worth to the customer? and What will they reasonably pay? This step translates the qualitative value into quantitative price tags. The logic is to capture as much value as you can (don’t underprice) without exceeding what customers are willing to pay (don’t overpriced and drive them away). It’s a delicate balance. Set prices too low, and you leave money on the table or even signal “low quality” inadvertently. Set them too high, and you might see low adoption or push prospects to competitors. There’s also a strategic angle: maybe you intentionally price low on an entry-level offering to land more customers (land-and-expand), or you price a certain feature add-on high to signal its premium nature. Every price sends a message.
Implementation Guidance: Start with research. Gather data on customer willingness to pay if possible – this can be through surveys, interviews, or observing behavior. Techniques like Van Westendorp price sensitivity analysis or Conjoint analysis can provide useful directional insights (e.g. customers might say their acceptable range for a tool like yours is $50-$100/user/month). Also study competitors: know where your offering stands in the market. If all your competitors charge roughly $100/month for similar packages, pricing yours at $300 will raise eyebrows (unless you have a very differentiated product or brand to justify it). Conversely, if you truly offer more value or target a more niche, mission-critical use case, you might successfully price above the pack. Look at your own cost structure and financial targets as well – ensure the price covers costs with healthy margins, especially if you have significant variable costs per user or usage. Many companies calculate a target gross margin and back into pricing from there.
Once you have data, choose price points for each package/metric combination. It often helps to create a pricing tier matrix – list your packages and think what a small customer vs. large customer would pay. Check if the jumps between tiers make sense relative to added value. For instance, if your “Standard” plan is $50 and “Premium” is $150, that jump of 3x should come with a major increase in value (additional features, higher limits, etc.) that justify it. Rules of thumb sometimes used: the “Better” tier might be ~2x the price of “Good”, and “Best” might be ~2-3x “Better”, but it truly depends on value provided. Also consider psychological pricing thresholds – prices ending in 9 (e.g. $49 instead of $50) can feel significantly cheaper due to customer perception, and crossing a big round number (say, going over $100) can be a psychological barrier. These little pricing psychology tricks (charm pricing, tier names, etc.) can impact conversion.
Tip: It’s often wise to test your pricing in controlled ways before a big rollout. For example, you might do a soft launch of new pricing to a small subset of customers or A/B test your pricing page if you have enough volume. See how it affects signups, conversion rates, and feedback. As much as quantitative research might suggest an “optimal” price, real-world behavior is the true test. You might find that a price point that should work on paper meets unexpected resistance due to competitor comparisons or budget cycles. For instance, a conjoint analysis might indicate users would pay $200/month, but when you consider their alternatives or internal budgeting, $200 might be a stretch. You might decide to go to market at $150/month to be safer, or conversely, you might find little pushback at $200 and even consider $250 if value is strong. Always align the final price with the customer's perceived value and the competitive landscape, not just theoretical willingness to pay data.
When setting prices, also plan for things like volume discounts or annual vs monthly rates. Many SaaS offer a lower effective price when customers commit annually (e.g. “$100/month, billed annually” vs. “$120 month-to-month”) to improve cash flow and retention. Ensure your rate-setting considers these structures. If your metric is usage-based, decide the rate (e.g. $0.05 per API call) and whether prices decrease with higher usage (tiered pricing) to encourage scale – a common practice in usage billing.
Real-World Insight: SaaS companies are increasingly realizing that pricing is not a “set-and-forget” activity. Market conditions and customer preferences evolve, so rate-setting is not a one-time decision. According to industry research, over 94% of B2B SaaS pricing leaders update their pricing or packaging at least once per year, and nearly 40% do it quarterly. This tells us that continuous tuning of price levels is normal – you should revisit your price points regularly to ensure they still make sense as your product and market change.
For example, Atlassian launched Jira with a dirt-cheap starter price ($10 for 10 users) which was hugely successful in driving adoption. As their user base grew and the product delivered more value (and as those small teams grew larger), Atlassian gradually adjusted pricing for larger user tiers and introduced higher-end editions. This land-and-expand strategy used an ultra-low entry price to hook customers, then relied on the product’s value to upsell accounts over time. The initial price point was set intentionally low for strategic reasons (wider adoption), not because $10 reflected the “value” of Jira to a 10-user team – in truth, the value was higher, but Atlassian traded short-term revenue for long-term market share.
This highlights that your rate-setting should tie back to your Step 1 goals: if your goal is market penetration, you might price lower; if it’s maximizing revenue per customer, you might price higher and focus on a more targeted segment.
When you do adjust pricing, do it carefully. Communicate changes clearly to customers, ideally grandfathering in existing customers or giving them plenty of notice, especially for increases. Many successful SaaS companies have incrementally increased prices as they’ve added more value to the product.
If you’ve done steps 1-3 well, you have a strong story for why your product is worth the price. Don’t be afraid to charge what you’re worth – just make sure to validate it with customer feedback and data.
Remember, a small change in price can have a big impact on your SaaS economics. A 5-10% price increase, if accepted by the market, can significantly boost your ARR without any new features or customers. Conversely, dropping price might boost volume but could also devalue the product in perception. Weigh these trade-offs with real data when possible.
Step 5: Operationalization – Implement, Monitor, and Evolve Pricing
The final step is often the most overlooked: operationalizing your pricing strategy. Even the best-designed pricing model will fail if you can’t execute it smoothly in the real world. Operationalization means integrating the new pricing into your day-to-day business and ensuring your organization can sustain it. This includes the systems, processes, and teams required to quote, charge, and manage customers under the new pricing model, as well as to iterate on it over time.
Purpose & Logic: The purpose of this step is to bridge the gap between theory and practice. You’ve defined what and how you want to charge; now you need to make it happen reliably. This involves everything from updating your billing systems to training your sales team on how to sell the new pricing. The logic is simple: a pricing strategy is only as good as its execution. If customers are confused by your billing, or sales reps keep giving unauthorized discounts, or your software isn’t metering usage correctly, the strategy can’t deliver its intended results. Pricing touches many parts of the organization – finance (invoicing, revenue recognition), sales (quoting and negotiation), customer success (handling change conversations), product (metering usage, gating features), and marketing (website pricing page, collateral). All these stakeholders need to be enabled and processes aligned.
Implementation Guidance: Start by reviewing your tools and systems. Does your current billing system support the new model? For example, if you moved to a usage-based metric, you need a way to track usage in real-time and include that on invoices. Many companies need to implement or upgrade systems like analytics instrumentation, billing software, or a CPQ (Configure-Price-Quote) system for sales to generate quotes for complex deals. In fact, depending on complexity, these implementations can take months (or even longer for giant enterprises) – it’s important to plan for this in your pricing project timeline. Skipping this preparation can lead to nightmare scenarios where sales has sold a new pricing scheme but finance can’t bill it properly, resulting in manual workarounds and errors. So, invest time to ensure metering is in place (developers may need to build usage tracking into the product), and that billing and CRM systems can handle the new tiers, addons, discount codes, etc.
Next, focus on team alignment and training. Your sales team needs to understand the new pricing inside-out: the rationale behind it (so they can convincingly communicate value), how to handle common objections, and what discounting latitude they have. It’s wise to establish a clear discount policy and deal approval process (sometimes called a Deal Desk for larger companies). This prevents well-meaning reps from undermining your carefully set rates with unnecessary discounts. Provide your sales and success teams with enablement materials – FAQs, cheat sheets, ROI calculators – so they can confidently execute. For instance, if a customer asks “why did you switch to usage-based pricing?”, your team should be able to articulate the value alignment argument, not fumble with “uh, we just decided to try it.”
Consider running internal training sessions or role-plays for salespeople on pitching the new pricing. Similarly, Customer Success should be prepped on talking to existing customers about any changes (if you’re migrating legacy customers to new pricing or upselling them into new packages). Marketing needs to update the website, pricing pages, and ensure messaging is consistent with your positioning. All these efforts ensure a cohesive rollout.
Another crucial aspect is operational policies: How will you handle grandfathering of old plans? How will you process upgrades/downgrades between the new packages? Do you need to adjust your terms of service or contracts to reflect the new pricing model (for example, adding a clause for overage charges)? Iron out these details before launch to avoid confusion later.
Once launched, monitor the performance closely. Treat the pricing change as a mini product launch – track metrics like conversion rates, average deal size, time-to-close, churn rates, ARPU, etc., to see if the new pricing is driving the intended outcomes. Set up feedback loops: get input from sales on where prospects are hesitating, listen to customer feedback on the new pricing (are they finding it expensive, cheap, confusing?). This will inform future tweaks.
Finally, remember that operationalizing pricing is an ongoing effort, not a one-time task. As discussed earlier, most SaaS companies revisit pricing regularly, so you need an infrastructure that can handle periodic updates. This might mean having versioned price books, or capabilities to A/B test pricing on your website, and a team (or owner) responsible for pricing strategy long-term. Many successful SaaS firms have a dedicated pricing person or team (or rely on outside experts) to continually optimize pricing and manage the operational complexities. Given that nearly all SaaS leaders adjust pricing at least annually, it pays to build internal muscle for pricing operations so these changes can be rolled out smoothly. Pricing changes can be sensitive – they affect your customers’ wallets – so operational excellence ensures you do this in a controlled, positive way (with customer communication plans, internal playbooks, etc.).
Real-World Example: If companies like Salesforce with a complex multi-tier, multi-product pricing system didn’t have robust pricing operations, the whole machine would have broken down. Or consider Twilio again: its usage-based model means Twilio processes billions of transactions and micropayments. They had to build a very scalable billing infrastructure and monitoring tools to make sure every SMS and API call is accurately tracked and billed. Without that, a usage pricing model simply collapses. These examples show that the behind-the-scenes execution is what enables the fancy pricing model to actually function day-to-day.
On a smaller scale, imagine you’re rolling out a new pricing scheme with a free tier and two paid tiers. Operationalization questions you’d face include: How do we prevent abuse of the free tier? (Maybe limit 1 account per company, or cap usage and have an automatic upgrade prompt.) How does a free user upgrade – is it self-service in-app or through sales? If self-service, your product team needs to implement that flow and your billing system needs to handle upgrading the subscription. If through sales, the CRM needs to flag when a free user hits a threshold so sales can reach out. All of these are operational details that, when handled well, make your pricing model succeed. When handled poorly, they can anger customers (e.g. surprise charges due to unclear policies) or frustrate employees (e.g. sales not knowing how to quote a unique use case).
Checklist for Operationalization: Before considering your pricing work “done,” ensure:
- Systems are updated (product metering, billing, invoicing, website) and tested for accuracy
- Sales/Success/Marketing teams are trained and have the resources to sell the new pricing
- Policies on discounts, grandfathering, and exceptions are defined and communicated;
- You have a monitoring plan to track how the pricing performs and a cadence to review and adjust as needed. With these in place, you greatly increase the odds that your pricing strategy will actually deliver results, rather than falling flat due to execution issues.
Now, with this framework in hand, you can audit your current pricing or design a new model systematically. The principles we've discussed aren't just theoretical; they're battle-tested methods that have been used by companies like Slack, Zoom, and Mixpanel.
Real-World Takeaways from Leading SaaS Companies
Let’s briefly recap with some real-world takeaways, incorporating lessons from SaaS leaders:
- Don’t Wait for a Crisis to Tackle Pricing
Slack and Zoom, both industry leaders, went years without pricing updates and only raised prices when market conditions forced their hand. A proactive approach – reviewing pricing annually and iterating – prevents the need for sudden drastic changes and ensures you’re continuously capturing fair value for new features and improvements. In 2024, 73% of SaaS companies raised prices – often modestly – as part of a planned strategy, not a panic move.
- Ad Hoc Discounting Erodes Your Revenue
Relying on reactive, deal-by-deal pricing decisions leads to revenue leakage. According to McKinsey, companies without pricing guidance for sales lose significant value to excessive discounting and concessions. If your team is making up discounts on the fly or inventing one-off packages to close deals, it’s a sign to implement a more standardized framework (and approval process) so that you stop “leaking” revenue.
- Align Price with Value (Customer-Centric Pricing)
Your pricing metric and packages should make sense to customers. When Mixpanel slashed prices and simplified plans in 2022, it was in response to customer feedback on cost and complexity – and it paid off by boosting adoption. Likewise, usage-based pricing is thriving because customers feel it’s fair: 80% say it better aligns cost to actual value received. Always ask, “Will the customer feel like this pricing is directly tied to the value they get?” If not, adjust the metric or structure until the answer is yes.
- Use a Framework to Future-Proof Pricing
The 5-step framework (Segmentation → Packaging → Metric → Price Points → Operationalization) provides a repeatable playbook as your product evolves. For instance, when launching a new product or major feature, walk through the steps: What segment is this for? Do we need a new bundle or add-on? What’s the best metric (maybe it’s AI-driven and usage-based makes more sense)? How do we price it relative to the value it delivers? And how will we roll it out in our billing and sales process? This ensures each change fits into an overall system rather than a patchwork. Companies that invest in a central pricing “control tower” and infrastructure to manage these steps see 15–25% higher profitability – essentially because they capture value more systematically than those winging it.
- Pricing is a Growth Lever, Not Just a Math Exercise
Perhaps the biggest mindset shift is viewing pricing as a strategic growth lever. In tougher economic times, SaaS leaders are finding that optimizing pricing can drive growth as much as investing in sales or marketing. A small increase in average selling price or a more effective upsell tier can boost ARR significantly. Improving monetization (pricing and expansion within accounts) often distinguishes the top performers. If you treat pricing with the same rigor as product development – using customer input, experiments, and data – you can unlock revenue growth without having to chase as many new logos. Monetization is the “second engine” of SaaS growth, alongside acquisition.
Conclusion: Turn Pricing Chaos into a Competitive Advantage
Instead of relying on gut feelings or copying competitors, the most successful companies treat pricing as a discipline. They invest the time to segment their market, design tailored packages, choose value-based metrics, set data-backed price points, and enable their teams to execute.
By following this 5-step framework, you ensure your pricing model is grounded in market reality and aligned with your business goals. If you’re looking at your own pricing and suspect there’s room for improvement – or you’ve been reactive about pricing up to now – it’s time to take a proactive approach. Monetizely specializes in helping B2B SaaS companies transform their SaaS pricing strategy using the exact principles outlined above. With our extensive 28+ years of experience leading pricing teams at companies such as Twilio, DocuSign, Squarespace, Zoom and LogMeIn, we have helped firms to unlock hidden revenue. So, don’t leave your pricing to guesswork or endless internal debates. Get in touch with our SaaS pricing experts today and get your free pricing assessment
